Hmmmmmm

May 11, 2016, 5:31 am
#1
Joined: Dec 17, 2007
Occupation: Taking Names, Formerly Kicking Ass
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 992
My lantern still works even though it is inside my small chest - bug?
Booooooooooo!
May 11, 2016, 6:20 am
#2
Joined: Sep 8, 2010
Occupation: Petty Functionary
Location: Drinking pea soup in the world map
Interests: Mangoes
Posts: 1,216
Can't say I've come across that before, but I hardly pay attention. It could very well be a bug.
Batman? wrote
its been so long since i had gotten that far i didnt think it through. arrrr!!!!!!
May 11, 2016, 9:03 am
#3
Joined: Apr 9, 2016
Occupation: Priestx of Sophos
Location: Standing on a big mine in GC1
Interests: the relation of queer crystal hyperfeminism and amphibious neutronium cybersocialist art
Posts: 258
If fluids can leak out of chests, why not light?
May 11, 2016, 10:56 am
#4
Joined: Dec 17, 2007
Occupation: Taking Names, Formerly Kicking Ass
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 992
Serin-Delaunay wrote
If fluids can leak out of chests, why not light?

I suppose that is true, but I didn't notice any loss of illumination which is probably a bug.
Booooooooooo!
May 11, 2016, 7:59 pm
#5
Joined: Dec 11, 2008
Posts: 1,770
How the lantern manages to illuminate your surroundings while it's in your "backpack" is its own problem. I guess you could just interpret it as having it strapped to your belt or something.
System would indicate in graphic if person is mounted on horse or not.
Same system also show if person mounted on boar, elephant, polar bear etc.
Or if person mounted on ass.
Ivan find mounting on ass funny.
May 11, 2016, 8:37 pm
#6
Joined: Sep 8, 2010
Occupation: Petty Functionary
Location: Drinking pea soup in the world map
Interests: Mangoes
Posts: 1,216
4zb4 wrote
How the lantern manages to illuminate your surroundings while it's in your "backpack" is its own problem. I guess you could just interpret it as having it strapped to your belt or something.

This is true. It would be pretty lame if the lantern had to be wielded by the player character all the time.
Batman? wrote
its been so long since i had gotten that far i didnt think it through. arrrr!!!!!!
May 12, 2016, 2:55 am
#7
Joined: Dec 3, 2007
Occupation: Chaos Weaver
Location: Standing between all life and death
Posts: 2,898
But why wouldn't you wield lanterns?
Uchuudonge wrote
creating stable chaos
making patterns where there should be none
sewing order into the chaos
you spit in the face of random numbers, of chaos
May 12, 2016, 5:09 am
#8
Joined: Sep 8, 2010
Occupation: Petty Functionary
Location: Drinking pea soup in the world map
Interests: Mangoes
Posts: 1,216
chaostrom wrote
But why wouldn't you wield lanterns?

Maybe to bash a kobold over the head. Do they make effective weapons?
Batman? wrote
its been so long since i had gotten that far i didnt think it through. arrrr!!!!!!
May 12, 2016, 8:38 am
#9
Joined: Apr 9, 2016
Occupation: Priestx of Sophos
Location: Standing on a big mine in GC1
Interests: the relation of queer crystal hyperfeminism and amphibious neutronium cybersocialist art
Posts: 258
Now that they explode on breaking, that sounds like a good way to get an unarmoured limb or a head burnt off.

Edit: OK, I went into wizmode and actually tested this. Aside: are item frequencies different in wizmode? I found an unbroken helmet of understanding on UT1!
As for wielded items breaking, I tried one gas grenade and two lanterns, with no other equipment of any kind. The gas grenade broke after a fighting just a few monsters with it. The lanterns were much more sturdy. I died about 10 times more often than than a wielded lantern broke. The two monsters which succeeded in breaking the lanterns were a greater carnivorous plant and a kobold with a mace, when I blocked an attack. The kobold's attack killed me (because of the mace damage, not the lantern's explosion). I forget whether the carnivorous plant's attack killed me. In any case, both explosions set my scrolls of wishing alight. I didn't carry any wands, so I don't know if the explosion was powerful enough to break them.
In conclusion, lanterns are terrible weapons, but they're less likely to kill you than hedgehogs.

SPOILER ALERT. Click here to see text.
Broken lanterns are viable weapons to kill Genetrix Vesana with, but she might kill you a few dozen times first
May 12, 2016, 4:46 pm
#10
Joined: Dec 11, 2008
Posts: 1,770
Lanterns actually make for pretty ok shields due to their roundness value, but basically any actual weapon or shield would be a better idea. There's not much reason to use a lantern because it'll level your Misc. weapon skill, which won't be handy further into the game.
System would indicate in graphic if person is mounted on horse or not.
Same system also show if person mounted on boar, elephant, polar bear etc.
Or if person mounted on ass.
Ivan find mounting on ass funny.
May 13, 2016, 12:11 am
#11
Joined: Sep 22, 2008
Posts: 634
4zb4 wrote
There's not much reason to use a lantern because it'll level your Misc. weapon skill, which won't be handy further into the game.
Light gloves (leather/cloth materials) are actually surprisingly decent weapons, even up to and including killing the enner beast in melee. They do kind of fizzle out once armour starts to be a thing.
Jun 13, 2016, 1:19 am
#12
Joined: Dec 2, 2007
Occupation: Big Daddy
Location: Under a pile of my own offspring
Interests: Caves
Posts: 612
could be light from some other source e.g. mutant bunny blood dripping on your weapon.
Jump to