Thanks.. there was a mysterious blank post by no user.
^ That's a good example of the weirdness of Markdown. Even with the single line breaks enabled, you have to leave 2 line breaks after a quote, otherwise it assumes the text following the quote is part of the quote
Aleksanderus said:
So what the new thing does becouse i'm too lazy to read everything
It's the text formatting for posts. The bold, italic, etc. toolbar is a lot smaller now, and the text is formatted differently.
Bold in BBCode:
[b]bold[/b]
Bold in Markdown:
**bold**
My main concern is that Markdown won't work well for certain forum-related things like quotes and spoilers.
Lines that start with > are quotes, but it gets weird when trying to attribute that quote to a user and post.
Looks like Stackoverflow uses >! to signify a spoiler, I'll see if I can add that on.
Also note that, unlike strict Markdown, single line breaks are allowed, and raw HTML is disabled
Alright, I made the switch to Markdown
Old posts are still parsed as BBCode.
Additionally, if you quote a BBCode post, your post will also be in BBCode to avoid formatting issues. Eventually as old posts stop being quoted, everything will be in Markdown.
There are some CSS things I need to fix, e.g. quotes are huge:
Abraham Lincoln said:
Test
Markdown also doesn't support a lot of the formatting that BBCode did:
I think we can do without underline and text alignment. I can probably hack the rest but wanted everyone to try out Markdown first and make sure we wanted to switch before wasting time on it.
So let's all give it a try for a couple weeks and see what everyone thinks.